•Jurors tend to treat low
a probability event that actually occurs as much more likely than it is.
–Jurors will believe it to have been more easily anticipated
and will assign greater urgency to guarding against it.
–Jurors often conclude that parties to a contract should
have anticipated every contingency.
–Jurors tend to blame “the big guy, with all his fancy,
high-priced lawyers.”
•A second order effect
is that the more bizarre the circumstances, the more jurors tend to believe
that it must have been “somebody’s fault.”
•One strategy for overcoming hindsight bias
is to argue by analogy to something familiar to jurors.